Kaleidos


About

The Kaleidos is a 1 MWe transportable HTGR microreactor. It uses helium coolant and TRISO fuel in a compact, factory-sealed unit designed for remote or constrained sites where small-footprint, reliable power is needed. As an HTGR, it is well suited for high-process heat applications such as industrial refining and hydrogen production.

DeveloperRadiant
Country of OriginUnited States
SizeMicro
TypeHigh-Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR)
Jump To:

Analysis

2

Deployment Timescale

2%

Score Justification

The Kaleidos reactor has pre-application regulatory engagement, but it does not yet have a completed civilian license. Its technical foundation incorporates multiple components with operational precedent in the HTR-PM, including helium coolant, graphite moderation, and HALEU TRISO fuel. Supply chain constraints for HALEU and TRISO fabrication limit near-term deployment pace.

By indicator

  • 1/4 Regulatory Engagement
    To what extent has the reactor developer engaged with a recognized nuclear regulatory authority in the licensing process? (30% of total score)
  • 4/6 Technology Precedent
    Has the reactor design, or a sufficiently similar design, been certified anywhere in the world? (10% of total score)
  • 3/3 Modularity
    What share of total reactor systems can be manufactured off-site in controlled factory environments rather than constructed on-site? (15% of total score)
  • 3/4 Specialization
    To what extent do construction activities and components require lengthy qualification processes? (15% of total score)
  • 2/5 Supply Chain
    How mature and available are suppliers for key reactor components and fuel services? (30% of total score)

Learn More About Deployment Timescale

5

Overnight Cost

5%

Score Justification

As a microreactor, the Kaleidos avoids many cost drivers of GW-scale plants (large pressure vessels, steam generators, extensive cooling systems, and major balance of plant). Site work is comparatively light, and the system is designed to arrive as an integrated unit, supporting favorable overnight cost expectations. 

By indicator

  • 4/4 Component Cost
    What is the expected cost of the reactor’s major components? (40% of total score)
  • 5/6 Construction Cost
    To what extent does the design reduce construction cost and risk through modular fabrication and limited nuclear-grade specialization? (60% of total score)

Learn More About Overnight Cost

4

Operational Cost

4%

Score Justification

Operating costs are dominated by fuel because the Kaleidos reactor uses HALEU TRISO fuel rather than standardassay LEU UO₂ fuel. Maintenance and staffing can be low because the design minimizes active systems and is intended to limit on-site intervention. Decommissioning largely entails a return of the sealed unit for servicingrather than extensive site repairs. 

By indicator

  • 1/3 Fuel Cost
    What is the estimated cost of nuclear fuel per unit of electricity generated, including enrichment, fabrication, and back-end costs? (15% of total score)
  • 4/4 Maintenance Cost
    What is the expected annual maintenance cost for the reactor and balance of plant systems, including consumables? (25% of total score)
  • 5/5 Staffing Level
    How many full-time personnel are required to safely operate and maintain the reactor unit? (40% of total score)
  • 3/5 Spent Fuel & Radioactive Waste Management Cost
    What are the expected operational costs associated with managing spent fuel, including interim storage, transport, disposal, or recycling? (10% of total score)
  • 5/5 Decommissioning Cost
    What are the total lifetime contributions required for decommissioning, regardless of funding mechanism? (10% of total score)

Learn More About Operational Cost

2

Cost Predictability

2%

Score Justification

The Kaleidos’ Cost Predictability is constrained by first-of-a-kind risk and the lack of an operating prototype or commercial reactor. Even with planned demonstrations, early units may face uncertainty in qualification, production learning curves, and supply availability. Standardized packaging helps, but real-world cost data have not been established yet.

By indicator

  • 0/5 Prototype
    To what extent has the reactor design been built, demonstrated, or commercially deployed in practice? (75% of total score)
  • 3/3 Modularity
    What share of total reactor systems can be manufactured off-site in controlled factory environments rather than constructed on-site? (25% of total score)

Learn More About Cost Predictability

5

Security

5%

Score Justification

The Kaleidos’ sealed, tamper-resistant unit supports security-by-design principles: no on-site refueling, limited access points, and reduced handling of nuclear material by operators. The design benefits from using HALEU fuel, and its thermal spectrum and high burnup are not optimized to produce weapons-usable material.

By indicator

  • 2/3 Fuel
    What is the enrichment level and composition of the reactor fuel? (40% of total score)
  • 4/4 Nuclear Material Production
    What is the potential for the reactor to produce weapons-usable nuclear material? (40% of total score)
  • 1/1 Security by Design
    Has the reactor developer built in security by design? (20% of total score)

Learn More About Security

3

Safety

3%

Score Justification

The Kaleidos benefits from inherently stable coolant behavior (helium) and strong fission product containment from the TRISO fuel. The design incorporates the autonomous fail-safe safety system, which is a fully passive shutdown and cooling system that automatically shuts down the reactor if conditions drift outside normal limits and provides indefinite decay heat removal without operator intervention. A full civilian regulatory safety case has not been approved yet because the reactor has not been licensed yet.

By indicator

  • 0/2 Safety Case
    How mature and publicly established is the reactor’s safety case with the regulator? (40% of total score)
  • 1/2 Shutdown Mechanism
    How diverse, independent, and passive are the reactor’s shutdown systems? (20% of total score)
  • 1/1 Fuel With Safety Characteristics
    Does the reactor use fuel with accident tolerance or inherent safety characteristics? (10% of total score)
  • 2/4 Pressure & Containment
    How well does the reactor’s containment strategy protect from the release of radioactive material? (10% of total score)
  • 3/3 Passive Heat Removal
    How long can the reactor remove core heat without operator intervention? (10% of total score)
  • 4/4 Coolant Reactivity
    How chemically reactive is the reactor coolant? (10% of total score)

Learn More About Safety

3

Spent Fuel & Radioactive Waste Management

3%

Score Justification

The Kaleidos is expected to generate low amounts of spent fuel compared to other reactors in this tool because of its micro size. The waste it does produce will include spent TRISO fuel and additional graphite-associated waste streams, alongside activated structural materials and off-gas waste. The on-site storage footprint can be small owing to the transportable unit concept. TRISO fuel results in higher spent fuel volume per unit of energy than LWRs; however, it retains relatively low volumetric decay heat at long cooling times, which is a significant driver of storage, transportation, and disposal dimensions.

By indicator

  • 0/1 Spent Fuel Licensing Precedent
    Has the spent fuel form been previously licensed for disposal? (20% of total score)
  • 3/4 Waste Streams
    How many distinct waste streams require separate conditioning or handling pathways? (20% of total score)
  • 3/3 On-Site Storage
    How much on-site area is required for interim spent fuel storage? (10% of total score)
  • 1/3 Spent Fuel Volume
    What volume of spent fuel is produced per unit of electricity generated? (15% of total score)
  • 2/2 Decay Heat
    What is the decay heat output of spent fuel at the 50-year interim storage milestone? (20% of total score)
  • 2/2 Time to Interim Storage
    What is the average time until spent fuel can be transferred to interim storage? (15% of total score)

Learn More About Spent Fuel & Radioactive Waste Management

2

Supply Chain

2%

Score Justification

Specialized microreactor manufacturing and qualified TRISO fuel fabrication are in the process of scaling. HALEU availability remains constrained, which could delay progress even if the reactor hardware is ready. 

By indicator

  • 1/2 Key Component Availability
    To what extent are commercial or pilot-scale suppliers available for the reactor’s major components? (60% of total score)
  • 2/4 Fuel Availability
    Are suppliers available for both fuel fabrication and enrichment required by the reactor design? (40% of total score)

Learn More About Supply Chain