e-Vinci
About
The e-Vinci is a 5 MWe sodium heat-pipe microreactor designed for flexible or off-grid electricity production. With an operating temperature of about 800 degrees Celsius, it can also be used for high-temperature heat applications like hydrogen production and industrial refining. The reactor uses a sealed core and factory-fabricated modules intended for delivery as a packaged system with limited on-site construction.
| Developer | Westinghouse Electric Company |
|---|---|
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Size | Micro |
| Type | Sodium Heat Pipe Reactor |
Jump To:
Analysis
2
Deployment Timescale
Score Justification
The e-Vinci developer is in pre-application engagement with the U.S. NRC and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. Although sodium heat-pipe microreactors have no operating commercial precedent and the e-Vinci is being pursued as a first-of-a-kind demonstration, the design incorporates multiple reactor components with operational precedent (HTR-PM in China), including graphite moderation and TRISO fuel. The reactor’s high degree of modularity will support rapid deployment, but it relies on a specialized sodium heat pipe supply chain.
By indicator
- 1/4 Regulatory Engagement
To what extent has the reactor developer engaged with a recognized nuclear regulatory authority in the licensing process? (30% of total score) - 3/6 Technology Precedent
Has the reactor design, or a sufficiently similar design, been certified anywhere in the world? (10% of total score) - 3/3 Modularity
What share of total reactor systems can be manufactured off-site in controlled factory environments rather than constructed on-site? (15% of total score) - 3/4 Specialization
To what extent do construction activities and components require lengthy qualification processes? (15% of total score) - 2/5 Supply Chain
How mature and available are suppliers for key reactor components and fuel services? (30% of total score)
5
Overnight Cost
Score Justification
Microreactor projects are typically in the tens to low hundreds of millions of U.S. dollars per unit because of their small footprint. The e-Vinci’s packaged architecture reduces required civil works, which reduces the scope of site construction.
By indicator
- 4/4 Component Cost
What is the expected cost of the reactor’s major components? (40% of total score) - 5/6 Construction Cost
To what extent does the design reduce construction cost and risk through modular fabrication and limited nuclear-grade specialization? (60% of total score)
4
Operational Cost
Score Justification
Operational assumptions emphasize few moving parts, a sealed core, and remote monitoring, which contribute to low maintenance and staffing needs. Expensive fuel costs result from the use of HALEU TRISO fuel. Decommissioning involves module removal rather than expensive on-site dismantlement.
By indicator
- 1/3 Fuel Cost
What is the estimated cost of nuclear fuel per unit of electricity generated, including enrichment, fabrication, and back-end costs? (15% of total score) - 4/4 Maintenance Cost
What is the expected annual maintenance cost for the reactor and balance of plant systems, including consumables? (25% of total score) - 5/5 Staffing Level
How many full-time personnel are required to safely operate and maintain the reactor unit? (40% of total score) - 3/5 Spent Fuel & Radioactive Waste Management Cost
What are the expected operational costs associated with managing spent fuel, including interim storage, transport, disposal, or recycling? (10% of total score) - 5/5 Decommissioning Cost
What are the total lifetime contributions required for decommissioning, regardless of funding mechanism? (10% of total score)
2
Cost Predictability
Score Justification
The e-Vinci does not yet have an operating prototype, though a test reactor is planned at Idaho National Laboratory. Factory fabrication contributes to more consistent manufacturing costs, but overall Cost Predictability remains low owing to the absence of first-of-a-kind baselining.
By indicator
- 0/5 Prototype
To what extent has the reactor design been built, demonstrated, or commercially deployed in practice? (75% of total score) - 3/3 Modularity
What share of total reactor systems can be manufactured off-site in controlled factory environments rather than constructed on-site? (25% of total score)
5
Security
Score Justification
The e-Vinci’s use of HALEU fuel and its thermal spectrum render the design not optimal for the production of weapons-usable material. Westinghouse has incorporated safeguards by design. While different than security by design, this effort shares overlapping characteristics such as access control, monitoring and surveillance, and material control and accountability that can also contribute to the reactor’s inherent security.
By indicator
- 2/3 Fuel
What is the enrichment level and composition of the reactor fuel? (40% of total score) - 4/4 Nuclear Material Production
What is the potential for the reactor to produce weapons-usable nuclear material? (40% of total score) - 1/1 Security by Design
Has the reactor developer built in security by design? (20% of total score)
3
Safety
Score Justification
The e-Vinci has not been licensed, so no approved safety case exists. The design uses TRISO fuel, which provides functional containment and high heat tolerance. In addition to negative reactivity feedback, the e-Vinci has another shutdown system in the form of drums that rotate to a shutdown position when the reactor is actively tripped. Sodium is confined to sealed heat pipes rather than circulating loops, thus enabling indefinite passive heat decay with reduced chemical hazard.
By indicator
- 0/2 Safety Case
How mature and publicly established is the reactor’s safety case with the regulator? (40% of total score) - 1/2 Shutdown Mechanism
How diverse, independent, and passive are the reactor’s shutdown systems? (20% of total score) - 1/1 Fuel With Safety Characteristics
Does the reactor use fuel with accident tolerance or inherent safety characteristics? (10% of total score) - 2/4 Pressure & Containment
How well does the reactor’s containment strategy protect from the release of radioactive material? (10% of total score) - 3/3 Passive Heat Removal
How long can the reactor remove core heat without operator intervention? (10% of total score) - 3/4 Coolant Reactivity
How chemically reactive is the reactor coolant? (10% of total score)
3
Spent Fuel & Radioactive Waste Management
Score Justification
The e-Vinci is not expected to produce a large absolute amount of waste compared to other reactors in the tool because of its microreactor size. The waste it does produce will include spent TRISO fuel, activated metals and components, irradiated graphite from the moderator, and sodium from the heat-pipe system. Spent TRISO fuel retains relatively low decay heat at long cooling times, which is an important driver of storage, transportation, and disposal. The sealed core enables off-site shipment for storage with limited on-site infrastructure.
By indicator
- 0/1 Spent Fuel Licensing Precedent
Has the spent fuel form been previously licensed for disposal? (20% of total score) - 3/4 Waste Streams
How many distinct waste streams require separate conditioning or handling pathways? (20% of total score) - 3/3 On-Site Storage
How much on-site area is required for interim spent fuel storage? (10% of total score) - 1/3 Spent Fuel Volume
What volume of spent fuel is produced per unit of electricity generated? (15% of total score) - 2/2 Decay Heat
What is the decay heat output of spent fuel at the 50-year interim storage milestone? (20% of total score) - 2/2 Time to Interim Storage
What is the average time until spent fuel can be transferred to interim storage? (15% of total score)
2
Supply Chain
Score Justification
The e-Vinci can rely on multiple commercial suppliers for graphite, but nuclear-qualified high-temperature heat pipes, integrated core assemblies, and control systems remain limited to pilot or single-vendor capability. HALEU enrichment has very limited commercial scale and TRISO fuel fabrication is largely pilot scale.
By indicator
- 1/2 Key Component Availability
To what extent are commercial or pilot-scale suppliers available for the reactor’s major components? (60% of total score) - 2/4 Fuel Availability
Are suppliers available for both fuel fabrication and enrichment required by the reactor design? (40% of total score)